Sharon's Muse.... Let's chat over coffee while I ponder some things

About Me


My Meez

   



Recent Entries



Archives



Personal


Interesting Sites



RAINE'S BLUES


GOLD MOUNTAIN


AGAIN


In Stores


Watch mini trailer


Clip of places featured in Again

Need Flashplayer to view. Give time to load.



TOOL & BAD BOYS



Short, Short Ebooks

Saturday, August 11, 2007




Redefining black beauty

A few months ago I posted on the subject of beauty and lookism and, in particular, who sets the standards for a whole culture. Whether we want to admit it or not, all of us in some way have been affected by media depictions of what is deemed beautiful and desirable. In the post, I noted that New York Magazine had even taken steps to redefine beauty outside of the limiting criteria set by the media and fashion industry. It was a bit of sand in an effort to build a dam against an onslaught of messages that deem only a small percentage of women (and men) as "worthy."

This issue blew up in black women's faces earlier this year when Imus made his casually caustic and racist remarks about the Rutgers women basketball team. What was so "shocking" about his statement was that it was no longer an implicit message, tightly interwoven and almost invisible in blanketed statement, plots, themes rife in television, books, news and especially Hollywood. No, Imus's words were out there in your face, crystrallized with the phrase "nappy-headed hos." There was no misinterpreting what he meant. Many black women, tired of our image being constantly assaulted, rose up in arms at Imus's brazen slap in the face and refused to be appeased by his "apology." The unhealed wound was exacerbated weeks later when a stupid black male comedian (nameless for this post) appeared on Leno and reiterated Imus' sentiment, all the while trying to get the audience to go along with his putdown: "Oh, c'mon, you know those women were ugly." Unlike the Imus episode, though, there was hardly any backlash from the media simply because the perpetrator this time was black, and the media doesn't feel the need to jump into a "family fray."

As I posted before, an -ism is a form of hatred, no matter who the perpetrator is. And the diligence with which these hatreds are fought sadly depends on how society views the victims. The truth is that the "worthiness" of the victims, and the empathy they will receive, rests on the disconnect between them and the masses. If there is a large disconnect, the empathy is hardly there. Instead, apathy sets in; the cold truth is that someone else's problem is never as urgent as our own.

It is up to the targets of whatever -ism is coming at her to speak up for herself. And thankfully many have spoken up otherwise as blacks and women, we would hardly have any rights at all. Recently, black women have been speaking loudly and consistently, so much so that their words have been echoing across the blogosphere. And it's finally catching the attention of those within hearing distance. Just last week, the AP wire carried an item on black women dating interracially that went worldwide. Black women were back in the news again, but this time there was no pilloring to be done (although expect to see some fallout).

Now it seems that Imus might have done black women a favor. With his blatant diminishment of black beauty, at least one company has decided to take a stand against his sentiment. Reading Evia's blog, which deals with black women redefining themselves against the society onslaught of negativity, as well as black women widening their options for relationship matches, I came across an interesting bit of news: Proctor & Gamble is creating a campaign for black women entitled "My Black is Beautiful" (remember the flack James Brown and Jesse Jackson got back in the day for iterating this sentiment). The program is "designed to ignite and support a sustained national conversation by, for and about black women. The initiative was created to serve as the catalyst for a movement that affects positive change in the way African American women are reflected in popular culture."

Cynic that I am, I'm sure P&G is fashioning some tie-in products with this campaign, similar to Dove's Campaign for Real Beauty, which for all its positive messaging, was an effort to push beauty products aimed at women's insecurities. Even so, these messages need to be out there, more sand for those levies that need to be built up against the tide of negative images that affect women, and women of color, in particular. P&G's multicultural marketing director, Najoh Tita Reid, states, "My Black is Beautiful is a celebration of the personal and collective beauty of African American women and encourages them to define and promote a beauty standard that is an authentic reflection of their spirit."

An actual call for us to redefine our own beauty standard - now that's empowering. Check out http://www.blogger.com/www.myblackisbeautiful.com.

Labels: ,



Read more!

Sharon Cullars Coffee Talk at 8/11/2007 08:32:00 AM Permanent Link     | | Home

---------------oOo---------------

Tuesday, March 13, 2007





Beauty, Part 2

Take a look through this slide show of "world class beauties" featured at MSN and tell me what is wrong with the whole picture. Think "standardization" and note that even with the various races from around the globe, the women seem to - well - look alike. Various colors, but no diversity of features.

Labels: ,



Read more!

Sharon Cullars Coffee Talk at 3/13/2007 08:27:00 AM Permanent Link     | | Home

---------------oOo---------------

Wednesday, March 07, 2007




The issue of beauty

Several years ago, I wrote an article about lookism for Elan, noting that studies showed that good-looking people got better treatment in the workplace, the judicial system, and even in their own homes. That was not-so-surprising news in the 90s as studies and books came out emphasizing this new -ism to be dealt with. Time has passed on, but the more things change, the more they stay the same. Recent studies indicate an economic disadvantage for the less pulchritudinous among us. In other words, "ugly" folk earn less in all walks of life. (Slate)

Is this really newsworthy though? Actually, most of us already knew in our guts or from actual observation that attractive people get over all the time, although it sucks there is an economic penalty if you don't measure up in the looks department. Researchers posit that attractive people are assumed to be more competent in the workplace and therefore, earn more money. They also question whether these situations are simply a matter of attractive people having more self-confidence because they've been treated as special all their lives.

Personally, I can attest to this nexus between good looks and self-confidence. I remember the pretty girls in my first through third grade classes - (Carolyn Tucker and Pamela Owens; I can't remember anyone else's name from those years). They were always placed first in line going to recess, always called on for answers, always chased by the boys. They may or may not have been smarter, but because they were pretty, all of us in the class treated them as top-tier, including me, including our teachers, which definitely leveraged points in their favor in the form of easy A's. The less attractive of us learned our places soon enough.

One of the troubling areas of lookism is how it affects the political arena. It really shouldn't matter what a candidate looks like to a voter; after all the focus should be on the issues and the candidate's character. But politicians these days are almost packaged like Hollywood figures, which means looks matter. Already political pundits are claiming Obama has it over his less attractive contenders, because, unfortunately, voters can be swayed by a handsome face and smile.

Which begs the question: who determines who's attractive, since beauty is basically subjective? Scientists have sought to rationalize the beauty standard through measurement and ratios. Although there is probably something to the argument that beauty is actually just "perfect symmetry" which crosses gender and racial subsets. Even babies have been shown to respond positively to "attractive" faces, proving that on some level, beauty is also instinctual.

Racially, the American standard is still geared heavily toward the caucasian norm, but is slowly widening to include other racial characteristics. Still, many minority women, particularly black women, suffer psychological scars from not meeting this prescribed standard and sometimes take drastic steps to pursue racial ambiguity.

In 2005, New York Magazine sought to define beauty on its own terms and featured the pictorial below of New Yorkers of various ages and different walks of life. Not trying to determine beauty by preset standards, the editors instead displayed the diversity of features and personalities in their subjects, providing a spectrum of beauty that is wider than that often featured in the media. Which shows that beauty, in the end, is a mosaic of varied features and forms - and that's a good thing.



Labels: ,



Read more!

Sharon Cullars Coffee Talk at 3/07/2007 08:01:00 PM Permanent Link     | | Home

---------------oOo---------------


Layout Design by Hajira Thanks to:Getty Images BlogspotBlogskins